Many researches suggests that IT was seen as a key enabler of controlling operations while also providing real-time information analytical tools. In 1950s and 1960s some of the hybrid organizational solution model, matrix,emerged. Companies that adopted these approach had the same drive as we have now days: need to be adoptive, information-intensive, team-based, collaborative, and empowered. But companies that adopted the hybrid design of the 1960s through 1980s soon learned that the new structures and systems bred conflict, confusion, information overload, and costly duplication of resources. Over past decades, strategic thinking has outdistances organizational capabilities. One of the "lessons learned" why matrix organizations didn't succeed in the past was understating about organization's inability to provide and manage timely information. All pressure of handling complexity was put on managers directly. They would have dazzling array of conflicting information.
Only the now days IT can provide the capabilities of meeting the information challenge and making the matrix organizational structure successful.
Some other important "lessons learned" from the past:
- Speed counts, but not at the expense of control.The faster the pace, the greater the need to monitor business operations and clearly define and enforce the rules of the road.
- Empowerment is not anarchy. The isolated efforts to empower employees can lead to disaster when not accompanied by more comprehensive redefinition of authority and control through organization.
- Transforming an organization requires more than just changing the structure.
Resource: Applegate, L. Corporate Information Strategy and Management. 2009.
No comments:
Post a Comment